Saturday, May 12, 2012

Chris's Western Conference Final Preview


“How the hell are we supposed to score on that guy?”
                It’s a legitimate question, Mr. Hypothetical Phoenix Coyotes/Los Angeles Kings forward. And though it is hypothetical here, I think we can say with reasonable certainty that this phrase will be uttered amongst both benches many, many times over the course of this series. How could it not? How could any fan with a modest knowledge of the unfolding of these playoffs not immediately see this as a showdown of two titanic goalies (but with a better handling of ice)?  I don’t mean to understate all of the work done by the other 36 skaters that will undoubtedly continue to work their tails off during every minute of this series, but can anybody realistically claim that either of these teams would be in the conference finals without their goaltending? I’d be curious to hear your argument. Just look at the numbers for these guys: Jonathan Quick is 8-1 with 1 shutout, has a GAA of 1.55 and a SVP of .949. Not to be outdone, Mike Smith is 8-3 with 2 shutouts, has a GAA of 1.77 and a SVP of .948. These are the kind of numbers that showed up when stick blades were straight, and elevating the puck was illegal.
                Ignore the “3-seed, 8-seed” thing. It means squat. Not only was this a case of a team winning a “weak” division (Phoenix only had 2 points more than Los Angeles this season, and San Jose was in between!), but is also a case of teams wholly outplaying their regular season showings. I’d like to think that home ice makes a difference here (especially in the Desert in late May), but that hasn’t mattered one iota during these playoffs, largely thanks to the Kings who are currently 5-0 on the road this postseason. The fact is that a myriad of molds have been broken this postseason. They are difficult to predict, and not just for me (seemingly for everybody except NZT’s own Ben Plotsky…kudos). With that in mind, let’s take a look at where these teams came from, what needs to happen now, and where they are going…yes, I will conclude with a prediction despite a horribly calibrated crystal ball.
                The Los Angeles Kings remind me in some ways of last year’s Boston Bruins: A goaltender putting up unworldly numbers, a big-money defensemen who has taken his game up to a whole new level, four solid lines of forwards that can play both sides of the puck and play rough if needed, defensive depth and versatility, the sudden and subtle emergence of a rookie who looks poised to play a long and successful NHL career, and last but not least, AN ABYSMAL POWERPLAY. Boston’s powerplay at the end of the playoffs last season was operating at 11.4%. That’s terrible, but you know what’s worse? Try the 8.5% efficiency at which Los Angeles is operating. I wrote in my prediction for the first round series between Boston and Washington that Boston needed to have a better powerplay. They didn’t. They finished the first round at 8.7%, and lost, but like last year’s Bruins, the Kings are more than making up for it with strong penalty killing and 5 on 5 play. They have a postseason high 4 shorthanded goals, and have leveraged that with a tough penalty kill to steamroll over Vancouver and St. Louis, the top two seeds in the Western Conference. When you couple that type of dominance with a goaltender stopping 19 of every 20 pucks, you go places. You go places such as, oh I don’t know, the Western Conference Finals? Notably, the Kings have won series in 5 and 4 games. Last year’s Bruins won 3 game 7s, one of which was in overtime.
                The Phoenix Coyotes did things the hard way in their first round matchup with the Chicago Blackhawks. The first five games of that series went to overtime, largely due to an unhealthy Coyote tendency to give up very late game-tying goals. Generally a recipe for disaster, the Coyotes didn’t seem to let this faze them; in fact, you could say they welcomed it. While we can lament their play late in the third period, we cannot lament it in overtime, as they compiled a 4-2 record in the first two rounds in that scenario, highlighted by back-to-back overtime winners by Mikkel Boedker against Chicago to take control of the series. In round two against Nashville, Phoenix leaned on Smith’s goaltending and was able to scrape up wins in 4 out of 5, despite being heavily outplayed over very long stretches by Nashville, in some cases being outshot almost 2 to 1. Much like their opponent, Phoenix was able to accomplish this with depth and balance, four capable, hard working lines that coach Dave Tippett could roll.
                Well, what needs to be done for either of these teams to swing what by all accounts should be a low-scoring goaltenders’ duel in their favor? The answer is fairly obvious for Los Angeles; they need to get the powerplay working. In a series where defense and goaltending will take the front stage, being able to capitalize on the powerplay is paramount to success. It may be the only chance LA will have to get consistent good chances against Mike Smith. If the powerplay wakes up, I don’t see a reason why LA should not take this series. They have played well enough shorthanded and five-on-five that a good powerplay will complete the spectrum, and make LA too much to handle for the Desert Dogs. Phoenix, on the other hand will need to become a more controlling team five on five. This is a big strength of the Kings, and Phoenix had a strong tendency to be out possessed for long stretches of play, only to sit back, defend well, be opportunistic on breakouts and turnovers and of course, get some solid goaltending from that Mike Smith guy. A team that takes advantage of its opportunities, as Phoenix has, always gives themselves a chance to win, but against Jonathan Quick and the Kings defense, those opportunities will be scarce, and then there’s always beating Quick, no easy task.
                Predicting this series is a challenge. Part of me thinks they should just drop the puck and keep playing until someone scores, then just let that team go to the finals. It could very well be more than 21 periods of hockey either way, so why not? They say that breaking a mirror brings you seven years of bad luck, but given what Quick and Smith will be staring at in the opposing goal, one of them is going to have to do it. Which one does? Seven is certainly an interesting number in this case. This is a long series, and neither team has played a game 7 yet. I think that’s what it will take, and I think the road warrior work that the Kings have done will help. I love what Mike Smith and Phoenix have done, but in this case, I think Los Angeles will just be over the top, as having Jon Quick negates the strength of the Coyotes goaltending, forcing the game to be played between the goal lines (imagine that). I expect the Kings to figure out their powerplay woes, and continue strong play 5 on 5, tilting the ice towards tinsel town. Kings in seven.
                As I put the finishing touches on this, the Rangers and Capitals are fighting for their lives, and fighting for a dance with the Devils. I will enjoy the rest of this game, hopefully make my pick for the Eastern Conference tomorrow, take a breath, and realize that all of this excitement is only halfway over.
Until then, cheers. 

No comments:

Post a Comment